@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ In a professional setting, clustering can be used to determine things like marke
✅ Think a minute about how you might have encountered clustering 'in the wild', in a banking, e-commerce, or business setting.
> 🎓 Interestingly, Cluster analysis originated in the fields of Anthropology and Psychology in the 1930s. Can you imagine how it might have been used?
> 🎓 Interestingly, cluster analysis originated in the fields of Anthropology and Psychology in the 1930s. Can you imagine how it might have been used?
Alternately, you could use it for grouping search results - by shopping links, images, or reviews, for example. Clustering is useful when you have a large dataset that you want to reduce and on which you want to perform more granular analysis, so the technique can be used to learn about data before other models are constructed.
@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ This data is too imbalanced, too little correlated and there is too much varianc
In Scikit-learn's documentation, you can see that a model like this one, with clusters not very well demarcated, has a 'variance' problem:
> Infographic from Scikit-learn
## Variance
@ -219,7 +218,7 @@ Hint: Try to scale your data. There's commented code in the notebook that adds s
Take a look at Stanford's K-Means Simulator [here](https://stanford.edu/class/engr108/visualizations/kmeans/kmeans.html). You can use this tool to visualize sample data points and determine its centroids. With fresh data, click 'update' to see how long it takes to find convergence. You can edit the data's randomness, numbers of clusters and numbers of centroids. Does this help you get an idea of how the data can be grouped?
Also, take a look at [this handout on k-means](https://stanford.edu/~cpiech/cs221/handouts/kmeans.html) from Stanford
Also, take a look at [this handout on k-means](https://stanford.edu/~cpiech/cs221/handouts/kmeans.html) from Stanford.
@ -44,17 +42,18 @@ In this section, you will need:
The history of trying to make computers understand human language goes back decades, and one of the earliest scientists to consider natural language processing was *Alan Turing*. When Turing was researching *artificial intelligence* in the 1950's, he considered if a conversational test could be given to a human and computer (via typed correspondence) where the human in the conversation was not sure if they were conversing with another human or a computer. If, after a certain length of conversation, the human could not determine that the answers were from a computer or not, then could the computer be said to be *thinking*?
[](https://youtu.be/QD8mQXaUFG4 "Chatting with Eliza")
The idea for this came from a party game called *The Imitation Game* where an interrogator is alone in a room and tasked with determining which of two people (in another room) are male and female respectively. The interrogator can send notes, and must try to think of questions where the written answers reveal the gender of the mystery person. Of course, the players in the other room are trying to trick the interrogator by answering questions in such as way as to mislead or confuse the interrogator, whilst also giving the appearance of answering honestly.
In the 1960's an MIT scientist called *Joseph Weizenbaum* developed [*Eliza*](https:/wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA), a computer 'therapist' that would ask the human questions and give the appearance of understanding their answers. However, while Eliza could parse a sentence and identify certain grammatical constructs and keywords so as to give a reasonable answer, it could not be said to *understand* the sentence. If Eliza was presented with a sentence following the format "**I am** <u>sad</u>" it might rearrange and substitute words in the sentence to form the response "How long have **you been**<u>sad</u>".
This gave the impression that Eliza understood the statement and was asking a follow-on question, whereas in reality, it was changing the tense and adding some words. If Eliza could not identify a keyword that it had a response for, it would instead give a random response that could be applicable to many different statements. Eliza could be easily tricked, for instance if a user wrote "**You are** a <u>bicycle</u>" it might respond with "How long have **I been** a <u>bicycle</u>?", instead of a more reasoned response.
[](https://youtu.be/RMK9AphfLco "Chatting with Eliza")
> 🎥 Click the image above for a video about original ELIZA program
> Note: You can read the original description of [Eliza](https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/1966/1/13317-elizaa-computer-program-for-the-study-of-natural-language-communication-between-man-and-machine/abstract) published in 1966 if you have an ACM account. Alternately, read about Eliza on [wikipedia](https://wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA)
### Task: Coding a basic conversational bot
### Exercise: Coding a basic conversational bot
A conversational bot, like Eliza, is a program that elicits user input and seems to understand and respond intelligently. Unlike Eliza, our bot will not have several rules giving it the appearance of having an intelligent conversation. Instead, out bot will have one ability only, to keep the conversation going with random responses that might work in almost any trivial conversation.
Jen Looper
4 years ago