The previous check was flawed because EFFECT_RAN would be set by the time it is checked, since a promise in a parent component will cause a delay of the inner component being instantiated. Instead we have a new field on the component context checking if the component was already popped (if se we are indeed too late). Don't love it to have a field just for this but I don't see another way to reliably check it.
Fixes#16629
* chore: run boundary async effects in the context of the current batch
* WIP
* reinstate kludge
* fix test
* WIP
* WIP
* WIP
* remove kludge
* restore batch_values after commit
* make private
* tidy up
* fix tests
* update test
* reset #dirty_effects and #maybe_dirty_effects
* add test
* WIP
* add test, fix block resolution
* bring async-effect-after-await test from defer-effects-in-pending-boundary branch
* avoid reawakening committed batches
* changeset
* cheat
* better API
* regenerate
* slightly better approach
* lint
* revert this whatever it is
* add test
* Update feature description for fork API
* error if missing experimental flag
* rename inspect effects to eager effects, run them in prod
* regenerate
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
* tidy up
* add some minimal prose. probably don't need to go super deep here as it's not really meant for non-framework authors
* bit more detail
* add a fork_timing error, regenerate
* unused
* add note
* add fork_discarded error
* require users to discard forks
* add docs
* regenerate
* tweak docs
* fix leak
* fix
* preload on focusin as well
* missed a spot
* reduce nesting
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: coordinate mount of snippets with await expressions
* try this
* deduplicate
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
The "is this a transparent effect we can ignore" logic for determining whether or not to play a local transition didn't account for pruned block effects. This fix marks the child branch as transparent if the block effect was, and during traversal then checks if the branch is the child of a block - if not that means it's the child of a pruned block effect.
fixes#16826
* perf: skip repeatedly traversing the same derived
We introduce a new flag which marks a derived during the mark_reaction phase and lift it during the execution phase.
* fix
This introduces a new flag which marks a derived as visited during the mark_reaction phase and lifts it during the dirty-check/execution phase (both are necessary because not all deriveds are necessarily executed, but they're always checked).
We could've used a Set on mark_reactions which would've been simpler to reason about, alas it was performing consistenly worse on the kairo_mux_unowned / kairo_mux_owned benchmarks (it kinda makes sense generally, creating and filling a set is more expensive than juggling flags).
Closes#16658, which showcases are particularly gnarly signal graph where many deriveds point to the same deriveds, where we would be traversing the same reactions over and over if we didn't do this.
I also added a similar measure (this time a set/map is unavoidable/makes more sense) for mark_effects, hopefully this helps for #16990
at present we only call batch.increment() when something async happens if we're not inside a pending boundary, but that's incorrect — it means that a batch is committed before everything resolves. When work inside a pending boundary does resolve, the batch becomes a zombie.
At the same time, we don't handle effects inside pending boundaries correctly. They should be deferred until the boundary (and all its parents) are ready.
This PR attempts to fix that — during traversal, when we exit a pending boundary, any effects that were collected get deferred until the next flush. We also distinguish between batch.#pending (any ongoing async work) and batch.#blocking_pending (any async work that should prevent effects outside pending boundaries from being flushed).
* fix: make `$inspect` logs come from the callsite
* default to showing stack trace
* reuse id
* DRY out, improve server-side inspect
* update docs
* ugh
* fix the dang tests
* ugh windows is there no punch bowl you won't poop in?
* argh
* how about this
* alright finally
Fixes#16850, fixes#16775, fixes#16795, fixes#16982#16631 introduced a bug that results in the effects within guards being evaluated before the guards themselves. This fix makes sure to iterate the block effects in the correct order (top down)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Holthausen <simon.holthausen@vercel.com>
* WIP implement `$effect.pending(...)`
* feat: `$state.eager(value)` (#16926)
* runtime-first approach
* revert these
* type safety, lint
* fix: better input cursor restoration for `bind:value` (#16925)
If cursor was at end and new input is longer, move cursor to new end
No test because not possible to reproduce using our test setup.
Follow-up to #14649, helps with #16577
* Version Packages (#16920)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs: await no longer need pending (#16900)
* docs: link to custom renderer issue in Svelte Native discussion (#16896)
* fix code block (#16937)
Updated code block syntax from Svelte to JavaScript for clarity.
* fix: unset context on stale promises (#16935)
* fix: unset context on stale promises
When a stale promise is rejected in `async_derived`, and the promise eventually resolves, `d.resolve` will be noop and `d.promise.then(handler, ...)` will never run. That in turns means any restored context (via `(await save(..))()`) will never be unset. We have to handle this case and unset the context to prevent errors such as false-positive state mutation errors
* fix: unset context on stale promises (slightly different approach) (#16936)
* slightly different approach to #16935
* move unset_context call
* get rid of logs
---------
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
* fix: svg `radialGradient` `fr` attribute missing in types (#16943)
* fix(svg radialGradient): fr attribute missing in types
* chore: add changeset
* Version Packages (#16940)
* Version Packages
* Update packages/svelte/CHANGELOG.md
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
* chore: simplify `batch.apply()` (#16945)
* chore: simplify `batch.apply()`
* belt and braces
* note to self
* unused
* fix: don't rerun async effects unnecessarily (#16944)
Since #16866, when an async effect runs multiple times, we rebase older batches and rerun those effects. This can have unintended consequences: In a case where an async effect only depends on a single source, and that single source was updated in a later batch, we know that we don't need to / should not rerun the older batch.
This PR makes it so: We collect all the sources of older batches that are not part of the current batch that just committed, and then only mark those async effects as dirty which depend on one of those other sources. Fixes the bug I noticed while working on #16935
* fix: ensure map iteration order is correct (#16947)
quick follow-up to #16944
Resetting a map entry does not change its position in the map when iterating. We need to make sure that reset makes that batch jump "to the front" for the "reject all stale batches" logic below. Edge case for which I can't come up with a test case but it _is_ a possibility.
* feat: add `createContext` utility for type-safe context (#16948)
* feat: add `createContext` utility for type-safe context
* regenerate
* Version Packages (#16946)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: Remove annoying sync-async warning (#16949)
* fix
* use `$state.eager(value)` instead of `$effect.pending(value)`
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyunbin Seo <47051820+hyunbinseo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben McCann <322311+benmccann@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
Co-authored-by: Hannes Rüger <hannes@hannesrueger.de>
Co-authored-by: Elliott Johnson <sejohnson@torchcloudconsulting.com>
* decouple from boundaries
* use queue_micro_task
* add test
* fix
* changeset
* revert
* tidy up
* update docs
* Update packages/svelte/src/internal/client/reactivity/batch.js
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
* minor tweak
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyunbin Seo <47051820+hyunbinseo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben McCann <322311+benmccann@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hannes Rüger <hannes@hannesrueger.de>
Co-authored-by: Elliott Johnson <sejohnson@torchcloudconsulting.com>
quick follow-up to #16944
Resetting a map entry does not change its position in the map when iterating. We need to make sure that reset makes that batch jump "to the front" for the "reject all stale batches" logic below. Edge case for which I can't come up with a test case but it _is_ a possibility.
Since #16866, when an async effect runs multiple times, we rebase older batches and rerun those effects. This can have unintended consequences: In a case where an async effect only depends on a single source, and that single source was updated in a later batch, we know that we don't need to / should not rerun the older batch.
This PR makes it so: We collect all the sources of older batches that are not part of the current batch that just committed, and then only mark those async effects as dirty which depend on one of those other sources. Fixes the bug I noticed while working on #16935
* fix: unset context on stale promises
When a stale promise is rejected in `async_derived`, and the promise eventually resolves, `d.resolve` will be noop and `d.promise.then(handler, ...)` will never run. That in turns means any restored context (via `(await save(..))()`) will never be unset. We have to handle this case and unset the context to prevent errors such as false-positive state mutation errors
* fix: unset context on stale promises (slightly different approach) (#16936)
* slightly different approach to #16935
* move unset_context call
* get rid of logs
---------
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
If cursor was at end and new input is longer, move cursor to new end
No test because not possible to reproduce using our test setup.
Follow-up to #14649, helps with #16577
Test for #16912
Also some explanation what the bug was:
1. async batch kicks off
2. outer async work succeeds, still something pending, so doesn't do anything for now
3. something unrelated writes to a signal (in the remote functions case it's the query writing to loading, raw etc), which creates a new batch
4. new batch executes. since there are multiple batches it takes the previous value which means if block is still alive. commits that, since no async work from the perspective of this branch
5. inner async work succeeds. now the batch has zero pending async work so it can flush. But the if block is no longer dirty since it was done by the other batch already -> never undos the other work
#16912 fixes it by still traversing the tree which means the if block deletion is scheduled to commit later, which it then does
Rich Harris
Simon H
github-actions[bot]
David
ComputerGuy
Paolo Ricciuti
Elliott Johnson
Hannes Rüger
7nik