* chore: make if blocks dead code eliminable
* chore: make if blocks dead code eliminable
* chore: make if blocks dead code eliminable
* address feedback
* address feedback
* prettier
---------
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
When the `value` or `checked` attribute of an input or the contents of a textarea were static, setting the `defaulValue/defaultChecked` property caused the latter to take precedence over the former. This is due to how we transform the code: If the value is static, we put it onto
* tests
* typings
* implement for defaultValue/defaultChecked on inputs
* docs (draft)
* selected
* fix test
* remove
* tweak
* changeset
* untrack reads, they could be inside an effect
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
* handle select reset case
* handle reset case specifically: use different props/queries in that case
* enhance test
* fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
* fix: better error messages for invalid HTML trees
closes#13331
* fix test
* more concise
* tweak
* tweak messages
* adjust tests
* tweak message slightly, so it doesn't sound like the bad element is the one we're currently encountering
* put locations in generated message
* tidy up
* consistency
* fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
* add failing test for #14268
* simplify
* proxify values when using ||=, &&= and ??= assignment operators
* proxify values assigned to private state fields
* changeset
* fix
* fix
* add warning
* update test
* fix: don't try to add owners to non-`$state` class fields
`$state.raw` and `$derived(.by)` will not have a state symbol on them, potentially causing a disastrous amount of traversal to potentially not find any state symbol. So it's better to not traverse them.
Potentially someone could create a `$state` while creating `$state.raw` or inside a `$derived.by`, but that feels so much of an edge case that it doesn't warrant a perf hit for the common case.
Fixes#14491
* for bind:, too
* fix: ensure SvelteDate cached methods have no reactive context
* fix: ensure SvelteDate cached methods have no reactive context
* fix
* lint
* use active reaction at time of instance creation
* tweak changeset
* Update packages/svelte/src/internal/client/dom/elements/bindings/shared.js
Co-authored-by: Paolo Ricciuti <ricciutipaolo@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Dominic Gannaway <dg@domgan.com>
Co-authored-by: Paolo Ricciuti <ricciutipaolo@gmail.com>
* turn `reactive_declaration_non_reactive_property` into a runtime warning
* ignore warning
* Update packages/svelte/src/internal/client/reactivity/effects.js
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update packages/svelte/src/internal/client/runtime.js
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix
* test
* changeset
* Update .changeset/witty-turtles-bake.md
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
* add some details
* check
* regenerate
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix `$.update` and `$.update_pre` for bigints
* resolve conflicts
* fix some things
* fix thing i definitely didn't just break
* hopefully this will fix it
* fix formatting
* simplify
* style consistency
* simplify
* changeset
---------
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
* fix: upgrade to esm-env 1.2.1 to fix issues with non-Vite setups
* fix (albeit with annoying warnings)
* bundle with conditions to silence noise
* production is probably better
---------
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <rich.harris@vercel.com>
fixes#14466
The logic introduced in #14395 was flawed - not every text or expression outside the template is the child of an attribute. This turns it around: We know that every child of a fragment is inside the template, so we ignore all text/expression tags that are not child of a fragment
Fixes#14399
Add a mechanism to connect render tags to snippets to know where to walk when coming across render tags
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Holthausen <simon.holthausen@vercel.com>
fixes#14439
This bug was introduced in #13642 because setting the input to null means the equality check ("is the input different") fails if you set the value to null
Also fixes#14441 - this bug was present for a long time, and the reason is the same as for the other bug: The equality check always returns "yes this is the same" if the value is undefined initially. The fix is similar; we need to initialize the input to something that can never be equal to whatever value is passed
This reverts #13255 / #13158, and helps with the validation error part of #14120
If you would have a component like this...
```svelte
<td>hi there</td>
```
...and then render it on the server via our `render` function like this:
```js
const result = render(Main);
```
...then right now you get an error saying that `td` is not valid at this position. But that doesn't seem right, because we should give people the benefit of the doubt: It may very well be that someone renders such a component and then correctly puts it into a `tr` tag themselves on the server (another example is rendering a full html document like in #14120).
All the other validation where there's a known parent (X not valid inside Y) is untouched by this.
Doing this as cleanup prior to tackling #13331
github-actions[bot]
Dominic Gannaway
Simon H
Rich Harris
Paolo Ricciuti
ComputerGuy
Ben McCann