one more (very contrived) test

entangle-batches-3
Simon Holthausen 2 weeks ago
parent 276a4c06d3
commit 180df1d513
No known key found for this signature in database

@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
import { tick } from 'svelte';
import { test } from '../../test';
const buttons = `
<button>up</button>
<button>down</button>
<button>show1</button>
<button>show2</button>
<button>shift a</button>
<button>shift t</button>
`;
export default test({
async test({ assert, target }) {
await tick();
const [up, down, show1, show2, shift_a, shift_t] = target.querySelectorAll('button');
// batch B: reveals boundary 1 -> commits with pending snippet, stays live
show1.click();
await tick();
assert.htmlEqual(target.innerHTML, `${buttons} <p>loading 1...</p>`);
// batch C: reveals boundary 2 -> commits with pending snippet, stays live
show2.click();
await tick();
assert.htmlEqual(target.innerHTML, `${buttons} <p>loading 1...</p> <p>loading 2...</p>`);
// batch A: writes a=1; the async-a effect is owned by C, so A merges with
// C and stays pending. B remains separate
up.click();
await tick();
// B's continuation first-reads `a`, which is overlaid by the pending
// merged batch. B has already committed its UI, so it cannot entangle —
// it reads the latest value (1) instead
shift_t.click();
await tick();
assert.htmlEqual(target.innerHTML, `${buttons} <p>late read: 1</p> <p>loading 2...</p>`);
// revert `a` to 0 inside the pending batch — its eventual commit leaves
// `a` unchanged. The write re-runs the late reader (it acquired `a` as a
// dependency), so it re-awaits a fresh deferred
down.click();
await tick();
// resolve the pending batch's async-a runs -> it commits
shift_a.click();
await tick();
shift_a.click();
await tick();
shift_a.click();
await tick();
assert.htmlEqual(target.innerHTML, `${buttons} <p>late read: 1</p> <p>async a: 0</p>`);
// resolve the late reader's re-run -> it converges on the committed value
shift_t.click();
await tick();
assert.htmlEqual(target.innerHTML, `${buttons} <p>late read: 0</p> <p>async a: 0</p>`);
}
});

@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
<script>
let a = $state(0);
let show1 = $state(false);
let show2 = $state(false);
let deferreds = [];
function push(key, v) {
const d = Promise.withResolvers();
deferreds.push({ key, v, d });
return d.promise;
}
function shift(key, override) {
const i = deferreds.findIndex((d) => d.key === key);
if (i === -1) return;
const [{ v, d }] = deferreds.splice(i, 1);
d.resolve(override ?? v);
}
</script>
<button onclick={() => a++}>up</button>
<button onclick={() => a--}>down</button>
<button onclick={() => (show1 = true)}>show1</button>
<button onclick={() => (show2 = true)}>show2</button>
<button onclick={() => shift('a')}>shift a</button>
<button onclick={() => shift('t', 1)}>shift t</button>
{#if show1}
<svelte:boundary>
<!-- no state deps initially; reads `a` for the first time only when
the awaited value (controlled by the test) says so -->
<p>late read: {(await push('t', 0)) > 0 ? a : -1}</p>
{#snippet pending()}
<p>loading 1...</p>
{/snippet}
</svelte:boundary>
{/if}
{#if show2}
<svelte:boundary>
<p>async a: {await push('a', a)}</p>
{#snippet pending()}
<p>loading 2...</p>
{/snippet}
</svelte:boundary>
{/if}
Loading…
Cancel
Save