![Diagram showing types of modules and their dependencies in Now in Android](images/modularization-graph.drawio.png "Diagram showing types of modules and their dependencies in Now in Android")
<td>Functionality associated with a specific feature or user journey. Typically contains UI components and ViewModels which read data from other modules.<br>
<li><ahref="https://github.com/android/nowinandroid/tree/main/feature/topic"><code>feature:topic</code></a> displays information about a topic on the TopicScreen.</li>
<li><ahref="https://github.com/android/nowinandroid/tree/main/feature/foryou"><code>feature:foryou</code></a> which displays the user's news feed, and onboarding during first run, on the For You screen.</li>
<td>Design system which includes Core UI components (many of which are customized Material 3 components), app theme and icons. The design system can be viewed by running the <code>app-nia-catalog</code> run configuration.
<td>Composite UI components and resources used by feature modules, such as the news feed. Unlike the <code>designsystem<code> module, it is dependent on the data layer since it renders models, like news resources.
Our modularization approach was defined taking into account the “Now in Android” project roadmap, upcoming work and new features. Additionally, our aim this time around was to find the right balance between overmodularizing a relatively small app and using this opportunity to showcase a modularization pattern fit for a much larger codebase, closer to real world apps in production environments.
This approach was discussed with the Android community, and evolved taking their feedback into account. With modularization however, there isn’t one right answer that makes all others wrong. Ultimately, there are many ways and approaches to modularizing an app and rarely does one approach fit all purposes, codebases and team preferences. This is why planning beforehand and taking into account all goals, problems you’re trying to solve, future work and predicting potential stepping stones are all crucial steps for defining the best fit structure under your own, unique circumstances. Developers can benefit from a brainstorming session to draw out a graph of modules and dependencies to visualize and plan this better.
Our approach is such an example - we don’t expect it to be an unchangeable structure applicable to all cases, and in fact, it could evolve and change in the future. It’s a general guideline we found to be the best fit for our project and offer it as one example you can further modify, expand and build on top of. One way of doing this would be to increase the granularity of the codebase even more. Granularity is the extent to which your codebase is composed of modules. If your data layer is small, it’s fine to keep it in a single module. But once the number of repositories and data sources starts to grow, it might be worth considering splitting them into separate modules.
We are also always open to your constructive feedback - learning from the community and exchanging ideas is one of the key elements to improving our guidance.