Merge pull request #298 from technosophos/doc/workflow-post-rebase

docs(workflow): re-adding workflow after rebase
pull/323/merge
Jack Greenfield 9 years ago
commit 6992508c25

@ -0,0 +1,515 @@
# Helm/DM Developer Experience Workflows
This document outlines the individual workflows that Helm is designed to
solve.
In this document we examine several workflows that we feel are central to
the experience of deploying, managing, and building applications using
Helm. Each workflow is followed by a basic model of where the processing
of commands occurs.
### User Workflow
The user workflow is the common case. This answers stories for the "tire
kicker" and "standard user" personas.
#### Installation
Currently, the client can be used with no installation. However, installing the server side component is done like this:
```
$ helm dm install
```
- Client uses existing `kubectl` configuration to install built-in manifests.
General pattern:
```
helm dm install
```
#### Searching
```
$ helm search bar
helm:example.com/foo/bar - A basic chart
helm:example.com/foo/barracuda - A fishy chart
helm:example.com/foo/barbecue - A smoky chart
```
- Client submits the query to the manager
- Server searches the available chart repos
General pattern:
```
helm search PATTERN
```
#### Simple deployment:
```
$ helm deploy helm:example.com/foo/bar
Created wonky-panda
```
- The client sends the server a request to deploy `helm:example.com/foo/bar`.
- The server assigns a random name `wonky-panda`, fetches the chart from
object storage, and goes about the deployment process.
General patterns:
```
helm deploy [-f CONFIG] [-n NAME] [CHART]
```
#### Find out about params:
In this operation, helm reads a chart and returns the list of parameters
that can be supplied in a template:
```
$ helm chart show helm:example.com/foo/bar
Params:
- bgcolor: The background color for the home page (hex code or HTML colors)
- title: The title of the app
```
- The client sends the request to the API server
- The API server fetches the chart, analyzes it, and returns the list of
parameters.
General pattern:
```
helm chart show CHART
```
#### Generate the params for me:
In this operation, helm generates a parameter values file for the user.
```
$ helm chart params helm:example.com/foo/bar
Created: values.yaml
$ edit values.yaml
```
- The client sends the request to the server
- The server returns a stub file
- The client writes the file to disk
General pattern:
```
helm chart params CHART [CHART...]
```
#### Deploy with params:
In this operation, the user deploys a chart with an associated values
file.
```
$ helm deploy -f values.yaml helm:example.com/foo/bar
Created taco-tuesday
```
- The client sends a request with the name of the chart and the values
file.
- The API server generates a name (`taco-tuesday`)
- The API server fetches the request chart, sends the chart and values
through the template resolution phase, and deploys the results.
If we allow the user to pass in a name (overriding the generated name),
then the server must first guarantee that this name is unique.
Alternately, just the values file may be specified, since it contains a reference to the base chart.
```
$ helm deploy -f values.yaml
Created taco-wednesday
```
#### Get the info about named deployment.
A deployment, as we have seen, is a named instance of a chart.
Operations that operate on these instances use the name to refer to the
instance.
```
$ helm status taco-tuesday
OK
Located at: 10.10.10.77:8080
```
- The client sends the API server a request for the status of
`taco-tuesday`.
- The API server looks up pertinent data and returns it.
- The client displays the data.
General pattern:
```
helm status NAME
```
#### Edit and redeploy:
Redeployment is taking an existing _instance_ and changing its template
values, and then re-deploying it.
```
$ edit values.yaml
$ helm redeploy -f values.yaml taco-tuesday
Redeployed taco-tuesday
```
- The client sends the instance name and the new values to the server
- The server coalesces the values into the existing instance and then
restarts.
General pattern:
```
helm redeploy [-f CONFIG] NAME
```
#### Delete:
```
$ helm delete taco-tuesday
Destroyed taco-tuesday
```
- The client sends the DELETE instance name command
- The API server destroys the resource
General pattern:
```
helm uninstall NAME [NAME...]
```
### Power User Features
Users familiar with the system may desire additional tools.
#### Name a deploy
```
$ helm deploy -name skinny-pigeon example.com/foo/bar
```
This follows the deployment process above. The server _must_ ensure that
the name is unique.
#### Get values for an app:
```
$ helm deployment params taco-tuesday
Stored in values.yaml
$ helm redeploy taco-tuesday values.yaml
```
- The client sends the instance name to the values endpoint
- The server returns the values file used to generate the instance.
- The client writes this to a file (or, perhaps, to STDOUT)
General pattern:
```
helm deployment params NAME [NAME...]
```
When more than one name is specified, the resulting file will contain configs for all names.
#### Get fully generated manifest files
```
$ helm deployment manifest taco-tuesday
Created manifest.yaml
```
- The client sends the instance name to the manifests endpoint
- The server returns the manifests, as generated during the
deploy/redeploy cycle done prior.
General pattern:
```
helm deployment manifest NAME [NAME...]
```
#### Auto-detecting helm problems
```
$ helm doctor
```
- The client performs local diagnostics and diagnostics of Kubernetes and the DM server.
General pattern:
```
helm doctor
```
#### Listing all installed charts
```
$ helm chart list
helm:example.com/foo/bar#1.1.1
helm:example.com/foo/bar#1.1.2
helm:example.com/foo/barbecue#0.1.0
```
- The client sends the server a request for all charts installed
- The server computes and responds
General pattern:
```
helm chart list
```
#### Get instances of a chart
NB: We might rename this `helm chart instances`, as that is less vague.
```
$ helm chart get helm:example.com/foo/bar
taco-tuesday
taco-wednesday
```
- The client sends a request to the API server.
- The server responds with a list of deployment instance names.
This retrieves a shallow list, and does not inspect instances for ancestor charts.
General pattern:
```
helm chart get CHART
```
### Listing deployments
```
$ helm deployment list
skinny-pigeon
taco-tuesday
taco-wednesday
```
- The client requests a list from the server
- The server returns the list
General pattern:
```
helm deployment list
```
### Getting details of a deployment
_NB: Might not need this._
```
$ helm deployment show skinny-pigeon
DETAILS
```
### Developer Workflow
This section covers the experience of the chart developer.
In this case, when the client detects that it is working with a local
chart, it bundles the chart, and sends the entire chart, not just the
values.
```
$ helm create mychart
Created mychart/Chart.yaml
$ helm lint mychart
OK
$ helm deploy .
Uploading ./mychart as localchart/mychart-0.0.1.tgz
Created skinny-pigeon
$ helm status skinny-pigeon
OK
$ edit something
$ helm redeploy skinny-pigeon
Redeployed skinny-pigeon
```
- `helm create` and `helm lint` are client side operations
- `helm deploy`, `helm status`, and `helm redeploy` are explained above.
General pattern for create:
```
helm create [--from NAME] CHARTNAME
```
Where `NAME` will result in fetching the generated values from the cluster.
General pattern for lint:
```
helm lint PATH
```
#### Packaging and Releasing packages
Package a chart:
```
$ helm package .
Created foo-1.1.2.tgz
```
Releasing a chart:
```
$ helm release -u https://example.com/bucket ./foo-1.1.2.tgz
Uploaded to https://example.com/bucket/foo-1.1.2.tgz
```
General pattern:
```
helm package PATH
helm release [-u destination] PATH|FILE
```
### Helm Cluster Management Commands
#### Install
```
$ helm dm install
```
- Client installs using the current kubectl configuration
General pattern:
```
helm dm install
```
#### Uninstall
```
$ helm dm uninstall
```
- The client interacts with the Kubernetes API server
General pattern:
```
helm dm uninstall
```
#### Check which cluster is the current target for helm
```
$ helm dm target
API Endpoint: https://10.21.21.21/
```
- The client interacts with the local Kubernetes config and the Kubernetes API server
General pattern:
```
helm search PATTERN
```
#### View status of DM service
```
$ helm dm status
OK
```
- The client interacts with the Kubernetes API server
General pattern:
```
helm dm status
```
### Repository Configuration
#### Listing repositories
```
$ helm repo list
```
- The client request info from the server
- The server provides information about which repositories it is aware of
General pattern:
```
helm repo list
```
#### Adding credentials
```
$ helm credential add aff34... 89897a...
Created token-foo
```
- The client sends a request to the server
- The server creates a new token and returns a name
General pattern:
```
helm credential add TOKEN SECRET
```
#### Adding a repository with credentials
```
$ helm repo add -c token-foo https://example.com/charts
```
The URL is of the form `PROTO://HOST[:PORT]/BUCKET`.
General pattern:
```
helm repo add [-c TOKEN_NAME] REPO_URL
```
#### Removing repositories
```
$ helm repo rm https://example.com/charts
```
- The client sends a request to the server
- The server removes the repo from the known list
General pattern:
```
helm repo rm REPO_URL
```
#### Listing Credentials
```
$ helm credential list
token-foo: TOKEN
```
- The client requests a list of tokens
- The server returns the name and the token, but not the secret
General pattern:
```
helm credential list [PATTERN]
```
#### Removing credentials
```
$ helm credential rm token-foo
```
- The client sends a request to the server
- The server deletes the credential
General pattern:
```
helm credential rm CREDENTIAL_NAME
```

@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
# Helm-DM Workflow Diagrams
# Helm Official
@startuml helm-official-workflow.png
autonumber
actor Member
actor Core
participant GitHub
participant CI
database Repository
Member->GitHub: PR New Chart
GitHub->CI: Run automated tests
CI->GitHub: Tests pass
GitHub-->Member: Tests pass
GitHub-->Core: Tests pass
Core<->Member: Discussion about chart
Core->GitHub: Code review
Core->GitHub: Release approval
GitHub->CI: Issue release
CI->Repository: Push release
Member->Repository: Get release
@enduml
# Public Chart Repository
An example workflow using Launchpad and BZR.
@startuml public-chart-repo.png
autonumber
actor Developer
actor Maintainer
participant Launchpad
Developer->Launchpad: Push branch with chart
Maintainer->Launchpad: Fetch branch
Maintainer->Maintainer: Locally test
Maintainer->Launchpad: Merge branch
... later ...
Maintainer->Launchpad: Create global release
Maintainer->Maintainer: Regenerate all versioned charts
Maintainer->Repository: Push charts
@enduml
# Private chart repository
An example workflow using an internal Gerrit Git repo and Jenkins.
@startuml private-chart-repo.png
autonumber
actor "Developer A" as A
actor "Developer B" as B
actor "Internal user" as Internal
participant Gerrit
participant Jenkins
participant "Docker registry" as Docker
participant "Chart repository" as Chart
A->Gerrit: Clone repo
A->A: Local development
A->Gerrit: Push branch
Gerrit->Jenkins: Test branch
Jenkins->Jenkins: Build and test
Jenkins->Docker: Snapshot image push
Jenkins->Chart: Snapshot chart
Jenkins->Jenkins: Integration tests
Jenkins-->A: Build OK
B->Gerrit: Code review
B->A: Code approval
A->Gerrit: Tag the new chart
Gerrit->Jenkins: Release
Jenkins->Jenkins: Build and test
Jenkins->Docker: Production image push
Jenkins->Chart: Production chart
Internal->Chart: Get production chart
@enduml
# Private Charts without repository
An example using SVN for local dev, and no chart repository.
@startuml private-chart-no-repo.png
autonumber
actor "Developer A" as A
actor "Developer B" as B
participant SVN
participant Kubernetes
A->SVN: Checkout code
A->A: Develop locally
A->SVN: Check in code
B<->SVN: Update local
B->Kubernetes: Run helm deploy on local chart
@enduml

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 30 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 18 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 44 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 22 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
# Team Workflows
This document explains the four team workflows that Helm is designed to
solve.
## An Overview of Four Team Workflows
The remainder of this document is broken into two major sections: The Overview covers the
broad characteristics of the four workflows. The Development Cycle
section covers how the developer cycle plays out for each of the four
workflows.
This section provides an introduction to the four workflows outlined
above, calling out characteristics of each workflow that define it
against other workflows.
### Helm Official
The _Helm Official_ project focuses on maintaining a repository of high-quality production-ready charts. Charts may be contributed by anyone in the broad community, and they are vetted and maintained by the Helm Official core contributors.
Stage | Devel | Review | Release | Store | Use
------|-------|--------|---------|-------|-----
Operations | Create/modify chart | Code review | Sign, version, package | Store releases | Get, Use
Who? | Developer | Us | Us | Us | Anyone
How? | Dev PR | We review | We release and sign | We upload to managed storage | Chart is public
Characteristics of the Helm Official workflow:
- Source code for charts is maintained in a GitHub repository
- Chart source is linted and tested by automated tools and human beings
- Charts are released by core contributors to the project
- All Charts are made available under the Apache 2 license
- When a chart is released, an official binary distribution is uploaded to the official chart repository in Google Cloud Storage. In addition, Helm Official charts have the following characteristics:
- They released by community members
- They are versioned independently (each chart has its own version)
- They are signed/provenanced by one of the official Helm GPG keys
- They are made available with no authentication or registration requirements
### Public Unofficial
The Helm project need not be the only repository available to users. Other organizations may wish to host their own repositories, and load whatever charts they so choose.
We attempt to provide flexibility that allows such organizations to build repositories as they see fit, but keep the end user's experience roughly similar.
Stage | Devel | Review | Release | Store | Use
------|-------|--------|---------|-------|-----
Operations | Create/modify chart | Code review | Sign, version, package | Store releases | Get, Use
Who? | Developer | Org? | Org? | Org | Anyone
How? | Dev Contribution | Org defines this | Org defines this | Org hosts | Chart is public
A public unofficial chart repository is free to structure the development cycle as they see fit.
- We have no opinions about the source control (if any) used for chart development
- We provide `helm release` as a tool for releasing a chart
- We strongly advise public repository maintainers to use provenance files
- We strongly advise public repository maintainers to make public keys available to the general public.
- Charts must be stored in one of the supported object storage repositories, including Google Cloud Storage and S3 compatible storage
- Helm/DM provides the following tools for working with such repositories:
- `helm release` takes local source and builds a chart.
- `helm repo add|list|rm` allows users to add, list, and remove repositories from the recognized list.
- `helm repo push` allows new charts to be pushed to a remote server
### Private Chart Repositories
We anticipate that some Helm users will desire to have private repositories over which they have control over both the development cycle and the availability of the released charts.
Similar to our approach to unofficial chart repositories, we attempt to provide a tool general enough that it can be used for private chart repositories.
Stage | Devel | Review | Release | Store | Use
------|-------|--------|---------|-------|-----
Operations | Create/modify chart | Code review | Sign, version, package | Store releases | Get, Use
Who? | Org | Org | Org | Org | Org
How? | Org defines this | Org defines this | Org defines this | Org hosts | Org controls access
We assume the following about this workflow:
- We have no opinions about the source control (if any) used for chart development
- We provide `helm release` as a tool for releasing a chart
- While we suggest signing charts, this is a discretionary exercise for private repositories
- Charts may be stored in private GCS, S3, or compatible object storage. Helm is tested on Minio (an S3 compatible server for private hosting) to ensure a viable private cloud mechanism.
- Private repositories may require authentication via token/secret, as well as access controls.
- Helm/DM provides the following tools for working with such repositories:
- `helm release` takes local source and builds a chart.
- `helm repo add|list|rm` allows users to add, list, and remove repositories from the recognized list.
- `helm repo push` allows new charts to be pushed to a remote server
### Private Charts without Repositories
In some cases, an organization may wish to create charts, but not store them in a chart repository. While this is not the preferred Helm workflow, we support tooling for this method.
Stage | Devel | Review | Release | Store | Use
------|-------|--------|---------|-------|-----
Operations | Create/modify chart | Code review | Sign, version, package | Store releases | Get, Use
Who? | Org | Org | Org | N/A | Org
How? | Org defines this | Org defines this | Org defines this | N/A | Org defines this
We operate on a different set of assumptions for this workflow.
- We have no opinions about the source code control (if any) used.
- We have no opinions about access control when repositories are not involved.
- Charts must be pushed into the cluster (the cluster will not pull from a non-repository location)
- Helm/DM provides the following tools for this workflow:
- `helm release` builds a package
- `helm deploy` pushes a package into a cluster
## Development Cycles for Each Workflow
In this section, we explain the developer cycle for each of the four workflows above.
### 0. Pre-Submission Workflow (aka Local Development)
Prior to submitting a chart for release, developers may use the following workflow. This workflow is assumed in all four sections below.
1. Create a chart with `helm create MYCHART` (or manually)
2. Edit the chart
3. Test the chart's standards conformance with `helm lint MYCHART`
4. Run a test deployment using `helm deploy MYCHART`
### 1. The Helm Official Development Cycle
The Helm Official project maintains source code in a location that is readily available to all of the community. Source code is stored on GitHub in the official (`github.com/helm/charts` or `github.com/kubernetes/charts`) repository. GitHub facilitates a development workflow that this project uses for chart maintenance.
There are two general classes of user that are important to this workflow:
- Core Contributors: Core contributors are developers that have been given special stewardship responsibilities over the repository. They have the following responsibilities:
- Review submissions to the repository
- Approve charts for release
- Respond to issues with existing charts
- Community Members: Any user of the Helm Official project who is not a core contributor.
![Helm Official Workflow](helm-official-workflow.png)
1. PULL REQUEST: A new chart (or an update to an existing chart) is contributed by a core maintainer or community member. This is done using GitHub pull requests.
2. AUTOMATED TESTING: Automated testing tools evaluate the contribution for the following:
- CLA approval of the submitter
- Style/format adherence
- Unit, functional, and/or integration tests pass
3. DISCUSSION: Any discussion on the pull request may happen using GitHub's commentary features
3. CODE REVIEW: Two or more core contributors must review the code and sign off on it.
4. RELEASE APPROVAL: If a chart is approved for release, a core maintainer may mark it as such
5. AUTOMATED RELEASE: Once a chart is approved for release, an automated tool will bundle the chart, sign it using an official signature, and upload it into the Helm Official repository
### 2. Unofficial Public Repositories
Unofficial repositories do not have a well-defined development workflow, but have a semi-rigid release workflow.
- The public repository must use a supported object storage system
- Charts must be in the same format
#### A Hypothetical Dev Workflow
An organization has a Bazaar (bzr) project maintained at _launchpad.net_, and has no automated tooling around the project.
![Unofficial Public Repo](public-chart-repo.png)
1. Developers work off of copies of the Bazaar code base
2. Developers push branches into the code review system when ready
2. A central maintainer approves and merges reviewed code
3. At a fixed point in time, the project administrator releases a new version of the entire repository
4. During this process, all charts are version, packaged/signed, and uploaded to the project's S3 repository, where they are made available to users
The above workflow illustrates how a development team may conduct public shared development, and release to a public repository, but with a workflow that diverges substantially from the model of the Helm Official repository.
### 3. Private Chart Repository
In this model, the entire process is managed by an organization.
#### A Hypothetical Dev Workflow
The organization uses an internally hosted Git server, Gerrit for code review, and Jenkins for automation. They host an internal repository on Minio. This repository has a combination of pre-approved Helm Official packages (copied from upstream) and internal packages.
In this workflow, charts are not stored together. Instead, each chart is stored alongside the Docker image source code. For example, the repository named `corpcalendar.git` is laid out as follows:
```
corpcalendar/
Dockerfile
src/
... # corpcalendar source code
chart/
corpcalendar
Chart.yaml
... # Helm Chart files
```
Each separate project is structured in this way.
![Private Repo](private-chart-repo.png)
1. Developers clone a desired repo (`git clone .../corpcalendar.git`)
2. Developers work on the code and chart together
3. Upon each commit, Jenkins does the following:
- Project tests are run
- A snapshot Docker image is built and stored in a snapshot Docker registry
- A snapshot chart is built and stored on a snapshot Helm repository
- Integration tests are run
4. When the developer is ready for a release, she tags the repository (`git tag v1.2.3`) and pushes the tag
5. Upon a tag commit, Jenkins does the following:
- Runs tests
- Creates a final Docker image and uploads to the internal release Docker registry
- Creates a final chart and uploads to the internal Helm repository
6. Internal users may then access the chart at the internal Helm repository
This workflow represents a method common in enterprises, and also illustrates how chart development need not occur in one aggregated repository.
### 4. Private Charts without Repositories
This model is used in cases where an organization chooses not to host a Chart repository. While we don't advise using this method, a workflow exists.
While we don't offer an opinionated VCS workflow, we also suggest that one is used. In our example below, we draw on VCS usage.
#### A Hypothetical Dev Workflow
A small development team uses Subversion (SVN) to host their internal projects. They do not use a chart repository, nor do they employ any automated testing tools outside of Helm.
![Private Charts with No Repo](private-chart-no-repo.png)
1. Developer Andy checks out a copy of the SVN repository (`svn co ...`)
2. Developer Andy edits charts locally, and test locally
3. When a chart is ready for sharing, the developer checks in the revised chart (`svn ci ...`)
4. Developer Barb updates her local copy (`svn up`)
5. Developer Barb then uses `helm deploy ./localchart` to deploy this chart into production
Loading…
Cancel
Save