From 980255efe008b751bc30ff5de14497b3c95e5086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:00:29 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] spelling: can Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> --- 5-retail/lessons/2-check-stock-device/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/5-retail/lessons/2-check-stock-device/README.md b/5-retail/lessons/2-check-stock-device/README.md index 5c3851f7..c56ca466 100644 --- a/5-retail/lessons/2-check-stock-device/README.md +++ b/5-retail/lessons/2-check-stock-device/README.md @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ You can use bounding boxes combined with probabilities to evaluate how accurate ![Two bonding boxes overlapping a can of tomato paste](../../../images/overlap-object-detection.png) -In the example above, one bounding box indicated a predicted can of tomato paste at 78.3%. A second bounding box is slightly smaller, and is inside the first bounding box with a probability of 64.3%. Your code can check the bounding boxes, see they overlap completely, and ignore the lower probability as there is no way one can can be inside another. +In the example above, one bounding box indicated a predicted can of tomato paste at 78.3%. A second bounding box is slightly smaller, and is inside the first bounding box with a probability of 64.3%. Your code can check the bounding boxes, see they overlap completely, and ignore the lower probability as there is no way one can be inside another. ✅ Can you think of a situation where is it valid to detect one object inside another?